| 1 | <easye> Ok. We start the abcl-1.1.0 "meeting" now. [21:00]
|
|---|
| 2 | ERC> /away herep. [21:01]
|
|---|
| 3 | *** You have been marked as being away
|
|---|
| 4 | ERC> /away herep.
|
|---|
| 5 | *** You have been marked as being away
|
|---|
| 6 | ERC> /away
|
|---|
| 7 | *** You are no longer marked as being away
|
|---|
| 8 | <easye> The format is informal: if anyone has some issue that hasn't been
|
|---|
| 9 | addressed properly, needs emphasis, etc. just speak up. [21:02]
|
|---|
| 10 | ERC> /topic abcl-1.1.0 release engineering (LIVE) [21:03]
|
|---|
| 11 | *** easye (~user@213.33.70.157) has set the topic for #abcl: "abcl-1.1.0
|
|---|
| 12 | release engineering (LIVE)"
|
|---|
| 13 | <stassats> i want a pony!
|
|---|
| 14 | * easye has not had time to prepare adequately.
|
|---|
| 15 | <easye> Pink?
|
|---|
| 16 | <easye> My daughter has you covered. [21:04]
|
|---|
| 17 | <stassats> whatever color you have, i can paint it later
|
|---|
| 18 | * easye laughs.
|
|---|
| 19 | <easye> stassats: your contributions are greatly appreciated.
|
|---|
| 20 | <easye> You are our "bugs barbecue". [21:05]
|
|---|
| 21 | <stassats> i'm just trying to run things is all
|
|---|
| 22 | <easye> Yeah. I don't get enough time using ABCL as things pop up.
|
|---|
| 23 | <easye> It's amazing to me that we pass more of the ANSI test suite than SBCL,
|
|---|
| 24 | but have more nits that block actual use. [21:06]
|
|---|
| 25 | <easye> The one point I would like to "bug" my fellow committers is that we
|
|---|
| 26 | really need to start collecting tests for things we fix.
|
|---|
| 27 | <easye> One test looks stupid, but once one collects a couple hundred, one
|
|---|
| 28 | gets a quasi "emergent" intelligence. [21:07]
|
|---|
| 29 | <easye> Is this something we (I) could do to facilitate collecting and
|
|---|
| 30 | committing tests? [21:08]
|
|---|
| 31 | <easye> For instance, is the use of RT as the base of ABCL-TEST-LISP, which
|
|---|
| 32 | lacks "tear-up/tear-down" methods somehow a stumbling block?
|
|---|
| 33 | * stassats is brewing another bug-report [21:36]
|
|---|
| 34 | *** ehu` (~ehuels@31.137.220.19) has joined channel #abcl [21:49]
|
|---|
| 35 | *** ChanServ (ChanServ@services.) has changed mode for #abcl to +o ehu`
|
|---|
| 36 | <easye> ehu: re #211, closure-common loads for me. [21:51]
|
|---|
| 37 | <ehu`> ah. then we can close. [21:52]
|
|---|
| 38 | <ehu`> perfect. [21:53]
|
|---|
| 39 | <easye> New failure in running hunchentoot seemingly related to CLOS/MOP:
|
|---|
| 40 | http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/ticket/198
|
|---|
| 41 | <ehu`> hmm. [21:55]
|
|---|
| 42 | <ehu`> 198?
|
|---|
| 43 | <ehu`> that can't be new.
|
|---|
| 44 | <easye> It is a different error.
|
|---|
| 45 | <easye> But maybe not. I'll bisect.
|
|---|
| 46 | <easye> But not now. [21:56]
|
|---|
| 47 | <ehu`> sure.
|
|---|
| 48 | <easye> #198 looks like MOP::CHECK-INITARGS according to the stack trace.
|
|---|
| 49 | [21:57]
|
|---|
| 50 | <ehu`> that can't cause any new CLOS/MOP errors?!"
|
|---|
| 51 | <easye> We're closing the abcl-1.1.0 srum at 2200 EST: anything else that
|
|---|
| 52 | someone wishes to mention for the logs?
|
|---|
| 53 | <easye> ehu: can you run hunchentoot on trunk? [21:58]
|
|---|
| 54 | <ehu`> I can try. [21:59]
|
|---|
| 55 | <ehu`> but later tonight.
|
|---|
| 56 | <easye> Fine.
|
|---|
| 57 | <ehu`> did we do much better over the last week? [22:02]
|
|---|
| 58 | * easye hasn't had time to figure things out from a mathematical basis.
|
|---|
| 59 | [22:03]
|
|---|
| 60 | ERC> /topic Armed Bear Common Lisp / abcl-1.0.1 / abcl-1.1.0-dev issues
|
|---|
| 61 | *** easye (~user@213.33.70.157) has set the topic for #abcl: "Armed Bear
|
|---|
| 62 | Common Lisp / abcl-1.0.1 / abcl-1.1.0-dev issues"
|
|---|
| 63 | ERC> |
|---|
