1 | Network Working Group C. Kalt |
---|
2 | Request for Comments: 2813 April 2000 |
---|
3 | Updates: 1459 |
---|
4 | Category: Informational |
---|
5 | |
---|
6 | Internet Relay Chat: Server Protocol |
---|
7 | |
---|
8 | Status of this Memo |
---|
9 | |
---|
10 | This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does |
---|
11 | not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this |
---|
12 | memo is unlimited. |
---|
13 | |
---|
14 | Copyright Notice |
---|
15 | |
---|
16 | Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. |
---|
17 | |
---|
18 | Abstract |
---|
19 | |
---|
20 | While based on the client-server model, the IRC (Internet Relay Chat) |
---|
21 | protocol allows servers to connect to each other effectively forming |
---|
22 | a network. |
---|
23 | |
---|
24 | This document defines the protocol used by servers to talk to each |
---|
25 | other. It was originally a superset of the client protocol but has |
---|
26 | evolved differently. |
---|
27 | |
---|
28 | First formally documented in May 1993 as part of RFC 1459 [IRC], most |
---|
29 | of the changes brought since then can be found in this document as |
---|
30 | development was focused on making the protocol scale better. Better |
---|
31 | scalability has allowed existing world-wide networks to keep growing |
---|
32 | and reach sizes which defy the old specification. |
---|
33 | |
---|
34 | Table of Contents |
---|
35 | |
---|
36 | 1. Introduction ............................................... 3 |
---|
37 | 2. Global database ............................................ 3 |
---|
38 | 2.1 Servers ................................................ 3 |
---|
39 | 2.2 Clients ................................................ 4 |
---|
40 | 2.2.1 Users ............................................. 4 |
---|
41 | 2.2.2 Services .......................................... 4 |
---|
42 | 2.3 Channels ............................................... 4 |
---|
43 | 3. The IRC Server Specification ............................... 5 |
---|
44 | 3.1 Overview ............................................... 5 |
---|
45 | 3.2 Character codes ........................................ 5 |
---|
46 | 3.3 Messages ............................................... 5 |
---|
47 | 3.3.1 Message format in Augmented BNF ................... 6 |
---|
48 | 3.4 Numeric replies ........................................ 7 |
---|
49 | 4. Message Details ............................................ 7 |
---|
50 | 4.1 Connection Registration ................................ 8 |
---|
51 | 4.1.1 Password message .................................. 8 |
---|
52 | 4.1.2 Server message .................................... 9 |
---|
53 | 4.1.3 Nick .............................................. 10 |
---|
54 | 4.1.4 Service message ................................... 11 |
---|
55 | 4.1.5 Quit .............................................. 12 |
---|
56 | 4.1.6 Server quit message ............................... 13 |
---|
57 | 4.2 Channel operations ..................................... 14 |
---|
58 | 4.2.1 Join message ...................................... 14 |
---|
59 | 4.2.2 Njoin message ..................................... 15 |
---|
60 | 4.2.3 Mode message ...................................... 16 |
---|
61 | 5. Implementation details .................................... 16 |
---|
62 | 5.1 Connection 'Liveness' .................................. 16 |
---|
63 | 5.2 Accepting a client to server connection ................ 16 |
---|
64 | 5.2.1 Users ............................................. 16 |
---|
65 | 5.2.2 Services .......................................... 17 |
---|
66 | 5.3 Establishing a server-server connection. ............... 17 |
---|
67 | 5.3.1 Link options ...................................... 17 |
---|
68 | 5.3.1.1 Compressed server to server links ............ 18 |
---|
69 | 5.3.1.2 Anti abuse protections ....................... 18 |
---|
70 | 5.3.2 State information exchange when connecting ........ 18 |
---|
71 | 5.4 Terminating server-client connections .................. 19 |
---|
72 | 5.5 Terminating server-server connections .................. 19 |
---|
73 | 5.6 Tracking nickname changes .............................. 19 |
---|
74 | 5.7 Tracking recently used nicknames ....................... 20 |
---|
75 | 5.8 Flood control of clients ............................... 20 |
---|
76 | 5.9 Non-blocking lookups ................................... 21 |
---|
77 | 5.9.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups ............................ 21 |
---|
78 | 5.9.2 Username (Ident) lookups .......................... 21 |
---|
79 | 6. Current problems ........................................... 21 |
---|
80 | 6.1 Scalability ............................................ 21 |
---|
81 | 6.2 Labels ................................................. 22 |
---|
82 | |
---|
83 | 6.2.1 Nicknames ......................................... 22 |
---|
84 | 6.2.2 Channels .......................................... 22 |
---|
85 | 6.2.3 Servers ........................................... 22 |
---|
86 | 6.3 Algorithms ............................................. 22 |
---|
87 | 7. Security Considerations .................................... 23 |
---|
88 | 7.1 Authentication ......................................... 23 |
---|
89 | 7.2 Integrity .............................................. 23 |
---|
90 | 8. Current support and availability ........................... 24 |
---|
91 | 9. Acknowledgements ........................................... 24 |
---|
92 | 10. References ................................................ 24 |
---|
93 | 11. Author's Address .......................................... 25 |
---|
94 | 12. Full Copyright Statement ................................... 26 |
---|
95 | |
---|
96 | 1. Introduction |
---|
97 | |
---|
98 | This document is intended for people working on implementing an IRC |
---|
99 | server but will also be useful to anyone implementing an IRC service. |
---|
100 | |
---|
101 | Servers provide the three basic services required for realtime |
---|
102 | conferencing defined by the "Internet Relay Chat: Architecture" |
---|
103 | [IRC-ARCH]: client locator (via the client protocol [IRC-CLIENT]), |
---|
104 | message relaying (via the server protocol defined in this document) |
---|
105 | and channel hosting and management (following specific rules [IRC- |
---|
106 | CHAN]). |
---|
107 | |
---|
108 | 2. Global database |
---|
109 | |
---|
110 | Although the IRC Protocol defines a fairly distributed model, each |
---|
111 | server maintains a "global state database" about the whole IRC |
---|
112 | network. This database is, in theory, identical on all servers. |
---|
113 | |
---|
114 | 2.1 Servers |
---|
115 | |
---|
116 | Servers are uniquely identified by their name which has a maximum |
---|
117 | length of sixty three (63) characters. See the protocol grammar |
---|
118 | rules (section 3.3.1) for what may and may not be used in a server |
---|
119 | name. |
---|
120 | |
---|
121 | Each server is typically known by all other servers, however it is |
---|
122 | possible to define a "hostmask" to group servers together according |
---|
123 | to their name. Inside the hostmasked area, all the servers have a |
---|
124 | name which matches the hostmask, and any other server with a name |
---|
125 | matching the hostmask SHALL NOT be connected to the IRC network |
---|
126 | outside the hostmasked area. Servers which are outside the area have |
---|
127 | no knowledge of the individual servers present inside the area, |
---|
128 | instead they are presented with a virtual server which has the |
---|
129 | hostmask for name. |
---|
130 | |
---|
131 | 2.2 Clients |
---|
132 | |
---|
133 | For each client, all servers MUST have the following information: a |
---|
134 | netwide unique identifier (whose format depends on the type of |
---|
135 | client) and the server to which the client is connected. |
---|
136 | |
---|
137 | 2.2.1 Users |
---|
138 | |
---|
139 | Each user is distinguished from other users by a unique nickname |
---|
140 | having a maximum length of nine (9) characters. See the protocol |
---|
141 | grammar rules (section 3.3.1) for what may and may not be used in a |
---|
142 | nickname. In addition to the nickname, all servers MUST have the |
---|
143 | following information about all users: the name of the host that the |
---|
144 | user is running on, the username of the user on that host, and the |
---|
145 | server to which the client is connected. |
---|
146 | |
---|
147 | 2.2.2 Services |
---|
148 | |
---|
149 | Each service is distinguished from other services by a service name |
---|
150 | composed of a nickname and a server name. The nickname has a maximum |
---|
151 | length of nine (9) characters. See the protocol grammar rules |
---|
152 | (section 3.3.1) for what may and may not be used in a nickname. The |
---|
153 | server name used to compose the service name is the name of the |
---|
154 | server to which the service is connected. In addition to this |
---|
155 | service name all servers MUST know the service type. |
---|
156 | |
---|
157 | Services differ from users by the format of their identifier, but |
---|
158 | more importantly services and users don't have the same type of |
---|
159 | access to the server: services can request part or all of the global |
---|
160 | state information that a server maintains, but have a more restricted |
---|
161 | set of commands available to them (See "IRC Client Protocol" [IRC- |
---|
162 | CLIENT] for details on which) and are not allowed to join channels. |
---|
163 | Finally services are not usually subject to the "Flood control" |
---|
164 | mechanism described in section 5.8. |
---|
165 | |
---|
166 | 2.3 Channels |
---|
167 | |
---|
168 | Alike services, channels have a scope [IRC-CHAN] and are not |
---|
169 | necessarily known to all servers. When a channel existence is known |
---|
170 | to a server, the server MUST keep track of the channel members, as |
---|
171 | well as the channel modes. |
---|
172 | |
---|
173 | 3. The IRC Server Specification |
---|
174 | |
---|
175 | 3.1 Overview |
---|
176 | |
---|
177 | The protocol as described herein is for use with server to server |
---|
178 | connections. For client to server connections, see the IRC Client |
---|
179 | Protocol specification. |
---|
180 | |
---|
181 | There are, however, more restrictions on client connections (which |
---|
182 | are considered to be untrustworthy) than on server connections. |
---|
183 | |
---|
184 | 3.2 Character codes |
---|
185 | |
---|
186 | No specific character set is specified. The protocol is based on a a |
---|
187 | set of codes which are composed of eight (8) bits, making up an |
---|
188 | octet. Each message may be composed of any number of these octets; |
---|
189 | however, some octet values are used for control codes which act as |
---|
190 | message delimiters. |
---|
191 | |
---|
192 | Regardless of being an 8-bit protocol, the delimiters and keywords |
---|
193 | are such that protocol is mostly usable from US-ASCII terminal and a |
---|
194 | telnet connection. |
---|
195 | |
---|
196 | Because of IRC's Scandinavian origin, the characters {}|^ are |
---|
197 | considered to be the lower case equivalents of the characters []\~, |
---|
198 | respectively. This is a critical issue when determining the |
---|
199 | equivalence of two nicknames, or channel names. |
---|
200 | |
---|
201 | 3.3 Messages |
---|
202 | |
---|
203 | Servers and clients send each other messages which may or may not |
---|
204 | generate a reply. Most communication between servers do not generate |
---|
205 | any reply, as servers mostly perform routing tasks for the clients. |
---|
206 | |
---|
207 | Each IRC message may consist of up to three main parts: the prefix |
---|
208 | (OPTIONAL), the command, and the command parameters (maximum of |
---|
209 | fifteen (15)). The prefix, command, and all parameters are separated |
---|
210 | by one ASCII space character (0x20) each. |
---|
211 | |
---|
212 | The presence of a prefix is indicated with a single leading ASCII |
---|
213 | colon character (':', 0x3b), which MUST be the first character of the |
---|
214 | message itself. There MUST be NO gap (whitespace) between the colon |
---|
215 | and the prefix. The prefix is used by servers to indicate the true |
---|
216 | origin of the message. If the prefix is missing from the message, it |
---|
217 | is assumed to have originated from the connection from which it was |
---|
218 | received. Clients SHOULD not use a prefix when sending a message |
---|
219 | from themselves; if they use one, the only valid prefix is the |
---|
220 | registered nickname associated with the client. |
---|
221 | |
---|
222 | When a server receives a message, it MUST identify its source using |
---|
223 | the (eventually assumed) prefix. If the prefix cannot be found in |
---|
224 | the server's internal database, it MUST be discarded, and if the |
---|
225 | prefix indicates the message comes from an (unknown) server, the link |
---|
226 | from which the message was received MUST be dropped. Dropping a link |
---|
227 | in such circumstances is a little excessive but necessary to maintain |
---|
228 | the integrity of the network and to prevent future problems. Another |
---|
229 | common error condition is that the prefix found in the server's |
---|
230 | internal database identifies a different source (typically a source |
---|
231 | registered from a different link than from which the message |
---|
232 | arrived). If the message was received from a server link and the |
---|
233 | prefix identifies a client, a KILL message MUST be issued for the |
---|
234 | client and sent to all servers. In other cases, the link from which |
---|
235 | the message arrived SHOULD be dropped for clients, and MUST be |
---|
236 | dropped for servers. In all cases, the message MUST be discarded. |
---|
237 | |
---|
238 | The command MUST either be a valid IRC command or a three (3) digit |
---|
239 | number represented in ASCII text. |
---|
240 | |
---|
241 | IRC messages are always lines of characters terminated with a CR-LF |
---|
242 | (Carriage Return - Line Feed) pair, and these messages SHALL NOT |
---|
243 | exceed 512 characters in length, counting all characters including |
---|
244 | the trailing CR-LF. Thus, there are 510 characters maximum allowed |
---|
245 | for the command and its parameters. There is no provision for |
---|
246 | continuation message lines. See section 5 for more details about |
---|
247 | current implementations. |
---|
248 | |
---|
249 | 3.3.1 Message format in Augmented BNF |
---|
250 | |
---|
251 | The protocol messages must be extracted from the contiguous stream of |
---|
252 | octets. The current solution is to designate two characters, CR and |
---|
253 | LF, as message separators. Empty messages are silently ignored, |
---|
254 | which permits use of the sequence CR-LF between messages without |
---|
255 | extra problems. |
---|
256 | |
---|
257 | The extracted message is parsed into the components <prefix>, |
---|
258 | <command> and list of parameters (<params>). |
---|
259 | |
---|
260 | The Augmented BNF representation for this is found in "IRC Client |
---|
261 | Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]. |
---|
262 | |
---|
263 | The extended prefix (["!" user "@" host ]) MUST NOT be used in server |
---|
264 | to server communications and is only intended for server to client |
---|
265 | messages in order to provide clients with more useful information |
---|
266 | about who a message is from without the need for additional queries. |
---|
267 | |
---|
268 | 3.4 Numeric replies |
---|
269 | |
---|
270 | Most of the messages sent to the server generate a reply of some |
---|
271 | sort. The most common reply is the numeric reply, used for both |
---|
272 | errors and normal replies. The numeric reply MUST be sent as one |
---|
273 | message consisting of the sender prefix, the three digit numeric, and |
---|
274 | the target of the reply. A numeric reply is not allowed to originate |
---|
275 | from a client; any such messages received by a server are silently |
---|
276 | dropped. In all other respects, a numeric reply is just like a normal |
---|
277 | message, except that the keyword is made up of 3 numeric digits |
---|
278 | rather than a string of letters. A list of different replies is |
---|
279 | supplied in "IRC Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]. |
---|
280 | |
---|
281 | 4. Message Details |
---|
282 | |
---|
283 | All the messages recognized by the IRC server and client are |
---|
284 | described in the IRC Client Protocol specification. |
---|
285 | |
---|
286 | Where the reply ERR_NOSUCHSERVER is returned, it means that the |
---|
287 | target of the message could not be found. The server MUST NOT send |
---|
288 | any other replies after this error for that command. |
---|
289 | |
---|
290 | The server to which a client is connected is required to parse the |
---|
291 | complete message, returning any appropriate errors. If the server |
---|
292 | encounters a fatal error while parsing a message, an error MUST be |
---|
293 | sent back to the client and the parsing terminated. A fatal error |
---|
294 | may follow from incorrect command, a destination which is otherwise |
---|
295 | unknown to the server (server, client or channel names fit this |
---|
296 | category), not enough parameters or incorrect privileges. |
---|
297 | |
---|
298 | If a full set of parameters is presented, then each MUST be checked |
---|
299 | for validity and appropriate responses sent back to the client. In |
---|
300 | the case of messages which use parameter lists using the comma as an |
---|
301 | item separator, a reply MUST be sent for each item. |
---|
302 | |
---|
303 | In the examples below, some messages appear using the full format: |
---|
304 | |
---|
305 | :Name COMMAND parameter list |
---|
306 | |
---|
307 | Such examples represent a message from "Name" in transit between |
---|
308 | servers, where it is essential to include the name of the original |
---|
309 | sender of the message so remote servers may send back a reply along |
---|
310 | the correct path. |
---|
311 | |
---|
312 | The message details for client to server communication are described |
---|
313 | in the "IRC Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]. Some sections in the |
---|
314 | following pages apply to some of these messages, they are additions |
---|
315 | to the message specifications which are only relevant to server to |
---|
316 | |
---|
317 | server communication, or to the server implementation. The messages |
---|
318 | which are introduced here are only used for server to server |
---|
319 | communication. |
---|
320 | |
---|
321 | 4.1 Connection Registration |
---|
322 | |
---|
323 | The commands described here are used to register a connection with |
---|
324 | another IRC server. |
---|
325 | |
---|
326 | 4.1.1 Password message |
---|
327 | |
---|
328 | Command: PASS |
---|
329 | Parameters: <password> <version> <flags> [<options>] |
---|
330 | |
---|
331 | The PASS command is used to set a 'connection password'. The |
---|
332 | password MUST be set before any attempt to register the connection is |
---|
333 | made. Currently this means that servers MUST send a PASS command |
---|
334 | before any SERVER command. Only one (1) PASS command SHALL be |
---|
335 | accepted from a connection. |
---|
336 | |
---|
337 | The last three (3) parameters MUST be ignored if received from a |
---|
338 | client (e.g. a user or a service). They are only relevant when |
---|
339 | received from a server. |
---|
340 | |
---|
341 | The <version> parameter is a string of at least four (4) characters, |
---|
342 | and up to fourteen (14) characters. The first four (4) characters |
---|
343 | MUST be digits and indicate the protocol version known by the server |
---|
344 | issuing the message. The protocol described by this document is |
---|
345 | version 2.10 which is encoded as "0210". The remaining OPTIONAL |
---|
346 | characters are implementation dependent and should describe the |
---|
347 | software version number. |
---|
348 | |
---|
349 | The <flags> parameter is a string of up to one hundred (100) |
---|
350 | characters. It is composed of two substrings separated by the |
---|
351 | character "|" (%x7C). If present, the first substring MUST be the |
---|
352 | name of the implementation. The reference implementation (See |
---|
353 | Section 8, "Current support and availability") uses the string "IRC". |
---|
354 | If a different implementation is written, which needs an identifier, |
---|
355 | then that identifier should be registered through publication of an |
---|
356 | RFC. The second substring is implementation dependent. Both |
---|
357 | substrings are OPTIONAL, but the character "|" is REQUIRED. The |
---|
358 | character "|" MUST NOT appear in either substring. |
---|
359 | |
---|
360 | Finally, the last parameter, <options>, is used for link options. |
---|
361 | The only options defined by the protocol are link compression (using |
---|
362 | the character "Z"), and an abuse protection flag (using the character |
---|
363 | |
---|
364 | "P"). See sections 5.3.1.1 (Compressed server to server links) and |
---|
365 | 5.3.1.2 (Anti abuse protections) respectively for more information on |
---|
366 | these options. |
---|
367 | |
---|
368 | Numeric Replies: |
---|
369 | |
---|
370 | ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
---|
371 | |
---|
372 | Example: |
---|
373 | |
---|
374 | PASS moresecretpassword 0210010000 IRC|aBgH$ Z |
---|
375 | |
---|
376 | 4.1.2 Server message |
---|
377 | |
---|
378 | Command: SERVER |
---|
379 | Parameters: <servername> <hopcount> <token> <info> |
---|
380 | |
---|
381 | The SERVER command is used to register a new server. A new connection |
---|
382 | introduces itself as a server to its peer. This message is also used |
---|
383 | to pass server data over whole net. When a new server is connected |
---|
384 | to net, information about it MUST be broadcasted to the whole |
---|
385 | network. |
---|
386 | |
---|
387 | The <info> parameter may contain space characters. |
---|
388 | |
---|
389 | <hopcount> is used to give all servers some internal information on |
---|
390 | how far away each server is. Local peers have a value of 0, and each |
---|
391 | passed server increments the value. With a full server list, it |
---|
392 | would be possible to construct a map of the entire server tree, but |
---|
393 | hostmasks prevent this from being done. |
---|
394 | |
---|
395 | The <token> parameter is an unsigned number used by servers as an |
---|
396 | identifier. This identifier is subsequently used to reference a |
---|
397 | server in the NICK and SERVICE messages sent between servers. Server |
---|
398 | tokens only have a meaning for the point-to-point peering they are |
---|
399 | used and MUST be unique for that connection. They are not global. |
---|
400 | |
---|
401 | The SERVER message MUST only be accepted from either (a) a connection |
---|
402 | which is yet to be registered and is attempting to register as a |
---|
403 | server, or (b) an existing connection to another server, in which |
---|
404 | case the SERVER message is introducing a new server behind that |
---|
405 | server. |
---|
406 | |
---|
407 | Most errors that occur with the receipt of a SERVER command result in |
---|
408 | the connection being terminated by the destination host (target |
---|
409 | SERVER). Because of the severity of such event, error replies are |
---|
410 | usually sent using the "ERROR" command rather than a numeric. |
---|
411 | |
---|
412 | If a SERVER message is parsed and it attempts to introduce a server |
---|
413 | which is already known to the receiving server, the connection, from |
---|
414 | which that message arrived, MUST be closed (following the correct |
---|
415 | procedures), since a duplicate route to a server has been formed and |
---|
416 | the acyclic nature of the IRC tree breaks. In some conditions, the |
---|
417 | connection from which the already known server has registered MAY be |
---|
418 | closed instead. It should be noted that this kind of error can also |
---|
419 | be the result of a second running server, problem which cannot be |
---|
420 | fixed within the protocol and typically requires human intervention. |
---|
421 | This type of problem is particularly insidious, as it can quite |
---|
422 | easily result in part of the IRC network to be isolated, with one of |
---|
423 | the two servers connected to each partition therefore making it |
---|
424 | impossible for the two parts to unite. |
---|
425 | |
---|
426 | Numeric Replies: |
---|
427 | |
---|
428 | ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
---|
429 | |
---|
430 | Example: |
---|
431 | |
---|
432 | SERVER test.oulu.fi 1 1 :Experimental server ; New server |
---|
433 | test.oulu.fi introducing itself and |
---|
434 | attempting to register. |
---|
435 | |
---|
436 | :tolsun.oulu.fi SERVER csd.bu.edu 5 34 :BU Central Server ; Server |
---|
437 | tolsun.oulu.fi is our uplink for |
---|
438 | csd.bu.edu which is 5 hops away. The |
---|
439 | token "34" will be used by |
---|
440 | tolsun.oulu.fi when introducing new |
---|
441 | users or services connected to |
---|
442 | csd.bu.edu. |
---|
443 | |
---|
444 | 4.1.3 Nick |
---|
445 | |
---|
446 | Command: NICK |
---|
447 | Parameters: <nickname> <hopcount> <username> <host> <servertoken> |
---|
448 | <umode> <realname> |
---|
449 | |
---|
450 | This form of the NICK message MUST NOT be allowed from user |
---|
451 | connections. However, it MUST be used instead of the NICK/USER pair |
---|
452 | to notify other servers of new users joining the IRC network. |
---|
453 | |
---|
454 | This message is really the combination of three distinct messages: |
---|
455 | NICK, USER and MODE [IRC-CLIENT]. |
---|
456 | |
---|
457 | The <hopcount> parameter is used by servers to indicate how far away |
---|
458 | a user is from its home server. A local connection has a hopcount of |
---|
459 | 0. The hopcount value is incremented by each passed server. |
---|
460 | |
---|
461 | The <servertoken> parameter replaces the <servername> parameter of |
---|
462 | the USER (See section 4.1.2 for more information on server tokens). |
---|
463 | |
---|
464 | Examples: |
---|
465 | |
---|
466 | NICK syrk 5 kalt millennium.stealth.net 34 +i :Christophe Kalt ; New |
---|
467 | user with nickname "syrk", username |
---|
468 | "kalt", connected from host |
---|
469 | "millennium.stealth.net" to server |
---|
470 | "34" ("csd.bu.edu" according to the |
---|
471 | previous example). |
---|
472 | |
---|
473 | :krys NICK syrk ; The other form of the NICK message, |
---|
474 | as defined in "IRC Client Protocol" |
---|
475 | [IRC-CLIENT] and used between |
---|
476 | servers: krys changed his nickname to |
---|
477 | syrk |
---|
478 | |
---|
479 | 4.1.4 Service message |
---|
480 | |
---|
481 | Command: SERVICE |
---|
482 | Parameters: <servicename> <servertoken> <distribution> <type> |
---|
483 | <hopcount> <info> |
---|
484 | |
---|
485 | The SERVICE command is used to introduce a new service. This form of |
---|
486 | the SERVICE message SHOULD NOT be allowed from client (unregistered, |
---|
487 | or registered) connections. However, it MUST be used between servers |
---|
488 | to notify other servers of new services joining the IRC network. |
---|
489 | |
---|
490 | The <servertoken> is used to identify the server to which the service |
---|
491 | is connected. (See section 4.1.2 for more information on server |
---|
492 | tokens). |
---|
493 | |
---|
494 | The <hopcount> parameter is used by servers to indicate how far away |
---|
495 | a service is from its home server. A local connection has a hopcount |
---|
496 | of 0. The hopcount value is incremented by each passed server. |
---|
497 | |
---|
498 | The <distribution> parameter is used to specify the visibility of a |
---|
499 | service. The service may only be known to servers which have a name |
---|
500 | matching the distribution. For a matching server to have knowledge |
---|
501 | of the service, the network path between that server and the server |
---|
502 | to which the service is connected MUST be composed of servers whose |
---|
503 | names all match the mask. Plain "*" is used when no restriction is |
---|
504 | wished. |
---|
505 | |
---|
506 | The <type> parameter is currently reserved for future usage. |
---|
507 | |
---|
508 | Numeric Replies: |
---|
509 | |
---|
510 | ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
---|
511 | ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME |
---|
512 | RPL_YOURESERVICE RPL_YOURHOST |
---|
513 | RPL_MYINFO |
---|
514 | |
---|
515 | Example: |
---|
516 | |
---|
517 | SERVICE dict@irc.fr 9 *.fr 0 1 :French Dictionary r" registered on |
---|
518 | server "9" is being announced to |
---|
519 | another server. This service will |
---|
520 | only be available on servers whose |
---|
521 | name matches "*.fr". |
---|
522 | |
---|
523 | 4.1.5 Quit |
---|
524 | |
---|
525 | Command: QUIT |
---|
526 | Parameters: [<Quit Message>] |
---|
527 | |
---|
528 | A client session ends with a quit message. The server MUST close the |
---|
529 | connection to a client which sends a QUIT message. If a "Quit |
---|
530 | Message" is given, this will be sent instead of the default message, |
---|
531 | the nickname or service name. |
---|
532 | |
---|
533 | When "netsplit" (See Section 4.1.6) occur, the "Quit Message" is |
---|
534 | composed of the names of two servers involved, separated by a space. |
---|
535 | The first name is that of the server which is still connected and the |
---|
536 | second name is either that of the server which has become |
---|
537 | disconnected or that of the server to which the leaving client was |
---|
538 | connected: |
---|
539 | |
---|
540 | <Quit Message> = ":" servername SPACE servername |
---|
541 | |
---|
542 | Because the "Quit Message" has a special meaning for "netsplits", |
---|
543 | servers SHOULD NOT allow a client to use a <Quit Message> in the |
---|
544 | format described above. |
---|
545 | |
---|
546 | If, for some other reason, a client connection is closed without the |
---|
547 | client issuing a QUIT command (e.g. client dies and EOF occurs on |
---|
548 | socket), the server is REQUIRED to fill in the quit message with some |
---|
549 | sort of message reflecting the nature of the event which caused it to |
---|
550 | happen. Typically, this is done by reporting a system specific |
---|
551 | error. |
---|
552 | |
---|
553 | Numeric Replies: |
---|
554 | |
---|
555 | None. |
---|
556 | |
---|
557 | Examples: |
---|
558 | |
---|
559 | :WiZ QUIT :Gone to have lunch ; Preferred message format. |
---|
560 | |
---|
561 | 4.1.6 Server quit message |
---|
562 | |
---|
563 | Command: SQUIT |
---|
564 | Parameters: <server> <comment> |
---|
565 | |
---|
566 | The SQUIT message has two distinct uses. |
---|
567 | |
---|
568 | The first one (described in "Internet Relay Chat: Client Protocol" |
---|
569 | [IRC-CLIENT]) allows operators to break a local or remote server |
---|
570 | link. This form of the message is also eventually used by servers to |
---|
571 | break a remote server link. |
---|
572 | |
---|
573 | The second use of this message is needed to inform other servers when |
---|
574 | a "network split" (also known as "netsplit") occurs, in other words |
---|
575 | to inform other servers about quitting or dead servers. If a server |
---|
576 | wishes to break the connection to another server it MUST send a SQUIT |
---|
577 | message to the other server, using the name of the other server as |
---|
578 | the server parameter, which then closes its connection to the |
---|
579 | quitting server. |
---|
580 | |
---|
581 | The <comment> is filled in by servers which SHOULD place an error or |
---|
582 | similar message here. |
---|
583 | |
---|
584 | Both of the servers which are on either side of the connection being |
---|
585 | closed are REQUIRED to send out a SQUIT message (to all its other |
---|
586 | server connections) for all other servers which are considered to be |
---|
587 | behind that link. |
---|
588 | |
---|
589 | Similarly, a QUIT message MAY be sent to the other still connected |
---|
590 | servers on behalf of all clients behind that quitting link. In |
---|
591 | addition to this, all channel members of a channel which lost a |
---|
592 | member due to the "split" MUST be sent a QUIT message. Messages to |
---|
593 | channel members are generated by each client's local server. |
---|
594 | |
---|
595 | If a server connection is terminated prematurely (e.g., the server on |
---|
596 | the other end of the link died), the server which detects this |
---|
597 | disconnection is REQUIRED to inform the rest of the network that the |
---|
598 | connection has closed and fill in the comment field with something |
---|
599 | appropriate. |
---|
600 | |
---|
601 | When a client is removed as the result of a SQUIT message, the server |
---|
602 | SHOULD add the nickname to the list of temporarily unavailable |
---|
603 | nicknames in an attempt to prevent future nickname collisions. See |
---|
604 | |
---|
605 | section 5.7 (Tracking recently used nicknames) for more information |
---|
606 | on this procedure. |
---|
607 | |
---|
608 | Numeric replies: |
---|
609 | |
---|
610 | ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
---|
611 | ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
---|
612 | |
---|
613 | Example: |
---|
614 | |
---|
615 | SQUIT tolsun.oulu.fi :Bad Link ? ; the server link tolson.oulu.fi |
---|
616 | has been terminated because of "Bad |
---|
617 | Link". |
---|
618 | |
---|
619 | :Trillian SQUIT cm22.eng.umd.edu :Server out of control ; message |
---|
620 | from Trillian to disconnect |
---|
621 | "cm22.eng.umd.edu" from the net |
---|
622 | because "Server out of control". |
---|
623 | |
---|
624 | 4.2 Channel operations |
---|
625 | |
---|
626 | This group of messages is concerned with manipulating channels, their |
---|
627 | properties (channel modes), and their contents (typically users). In |
---|
628 | implementing these, a number of race conditions are inevitable when |
---|
629 | users at opposing ends of a network send commands which will |
---|
630 | ultimately clash. It is also REQUIRED that servers keep a nickname |
---|
631 | history to ensure that wherever a <nick> parameter is given, the |
---|
632 | server check its history in case it has recently been changed. |
---|
633 | |
---|
634 | 4.2.1 Join message |
---|
635 | |
---|
636 | Command: JOIN |
---|
637 | Parameters: <channel>[ %x7 <modes> ] |
---|
638 | *( "," <channel>[ %x7 <modes> ] ) |
---|
639 | |
---|
640 | The JOIN command is used by client to start listening a specific |
---|
641 | channel. Whether or not a client is allowed to join a channel is |
---|
642 | checked only by the local server the client is connected to; all |
---|
643 | other servers automatically add the user to the channel when the |
---|
644 | command is received from other servers. |
---|
645 | |
---|
646 | Optionally, the user status (channel modes 'O', 'o', and 'v') on the |
---|
647 | channel may be appended to the channel name using a control G (^G or |
---|
648 | ASCII 7) as separator. Such data MUST be ignored if the message |
---|
649 | wasn't received from a server. This format MUST NOT be sent to |
---|
650 | clients, it can only be used between servers and SHOULD be avoided. |
---|
651 | |
---|
652 | The JOIN command MUST be broadcast to all servers so that each server |
---|
653 | knows where to find the users who are on the channel. This allows |
---|
654 | optimal delivery of PRIVMSG and NOTICE messages to the channel. |
---|
655 | |
---|
656 | Numeric Replies: |
---|
657 | |
---|
658 | ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN |
---|
659 | ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN ERR_BADCHANNELKEY |
---|
660 | ERR_CHANNELISFULL ERR_BADCHANMASK |
---|
661 | ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS |
---|
662 | ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS ERR_UNAVAILRESOURCE |
---|
663 | RPL_TOPIC |
---|
664 | |
---|
665 | Examples: |
---|
666 | |
---|
667 | :WiZ JOIN #Twilight_zone ; JOIN message from WiZ |
---|
668 | |
---|
669 | 4.2.2 Njoin message |
---|
670 | |
---|
671 | Command: NJOIN |
---|
672 | Parameters: <channel> [ "@@" / "@" ] [ "+" ] <nickname> |
---|
673 | *( "," [ "@@" / "@" ] [ "+" ] <nickname> ) |
---|
674 | |
---|
675 | The NJOIN message is used between servers only. If such a message is |
---|
676 | received from a client, it MUST be ignored. It is used when two |
---|
677 | servers connect to each other to exchange the list of channel members |
---|
678 | for each channel. |
---|
679 | |
---|
680 | Even though the same function can be performed by using a succession |
---|
681 | of JOIN, this message SHOULD be used instead as it is more efficient. |
---|
682 | The prefix "@@" indicates that the user is the "channel creator", the |
---|
683 | character "@" alone indicates a "channel operator", and the character |
---|
684 | '+' indicates that the user has the voice privilege. |
---|
685 | |
---|
686 | Numeric Replies: |
---|
687 | |
---|
688 | ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL |
---|
689 | ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
---|
690 | |
---|
691 | Examples: |
---|
692 | |
---|
693 | :ircd.stealth.net NJOIN #Twilight_zone :@WiZ,+syrk,avalon ; NJOIN |
---|
694 | message from ircd.stealth.net |
---|
695 | announcing users joining the |
---|
696 | #Twilight_zone channel: WiZ with |
---|
697 | channel operator status, syrk with |
---|
698 | voice privilege and avalon with no |
---|
699 | privilege. |
---|
700 | |
---|
701 | 4.2.3 Mode message |
---|
702 | |
---|
703 | The MODE message is a dual-purpose command in IRC. It allows both |
---|
704 | usernames and channels to have their mode changed. |
---|
705 | |
---|
706 | When parsing MODE messages, it is RECOMMENDED that the entire message |
---|
707 | be parsed first, and then the changes which resulted passed on. |
---|
708 | |
---|
709 | It is REQUIRED that servers are able to change channel modes so that |
---|
710 | "channel creator" and "channel operators" may be created. |
---|
711 | |
---|
712 | 5. Implementation details |
---|
713 | |
---|
714 | A the time of writing, the only current implementation of this |
---|
715 | protocol is the IRC server, version 2.10. Earlier versions may |
---|
716 | implement some or all of the commands described by this document with |
---|
717 | NOTICE messages replacing many of the numeric replies. Unfortunately, |
---|
718 | due to backward compatibility requirements, the implementation of |
---|
719 | some parts of this document varies with what is laid out. One |
---|
720 | notable difference is: |
---|
721 | |
---|
722 | * recognition that any LF or CR anywhere in a message marks |
---|
723 | the end of that message (instead of requiring CR-LF); |
---|
724 | |
---|
725 | The rest of this section deals with issues that are mostly of |
---|
726 | importance to those who wish to implement a server but some parts |
---|
727 | also apply directly to clients as well. |
---|
728 | |
---|
729 | 5.1 Connection 'Liveness' |
---|
730 | |
---|
731 | To detect when a connection has died or become unresponsive, the |
---|
732 | server MUST poll each of its connections. The PING command (See "IRC |
---|
733 | Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]) is used if the server doesn't get a |
---|
734 | response from its peer in a given amount of time. |
---|
735 | |
---|
736 | If a connection doesn't respond in time, its connection is closed |
---|
737 | using the appropriate procedures. |
---|
738 | |
---|
739 | 5.2 Accepting a client to server connection |
---|
740 | |
---|
741 | 5.2.1 Users |
---|
742 | |
---|
743 | When a server successfully registers a new user connection, it is |
---|
744 | REQUIRED to send to the user unambiguous messages stating: the user |
---|
745 | identifiers upon which it was registered (RPL_WELCOME), the server |
---|
746 | name and version (RPL_YOURHOST), the server birth information |
---|
747 | (RPL_CREATED), available user and channel modes (RPL_MYINFO), and it |
---|
748 | MAY send any introductory messages which may be deemed appropriate. |
---|
749 | |
---|
750 | In particular the server SHALL send the current user/service/server |
---|
751 | count (as per the LUSER reply) and finally the MOTD (if any, as per |
---|
752 | the MOTD reply). |
---|
753 | |
---|
754 | After dealing with registration, the server MUST then send out to |
---|
755 | other servers the new user's nickname (NICK message), other |
---|
756 | information as supplied by itself (USER message) and as the server |
---|
757 | could discover (from DNS servers). The server MUST NOT send this |
---|
758 | information out with a pair of NICK and USER messages as defined in |
---|
759 | "IRC Client Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT], but MUST instead take advantage |
---|
760 | of the extended NICK message defined in section 4.1.3. |
---|
761 | |
---|
762 | 5.2.2 Services |
---|
763 | |
---|
764 | Upon successfully registering a new service connection, the server is |
---|
765 | subject to the same kind of REQUIREMENTS as for a user. Services |
---|
766 | being somewhat different, only the following replies are sent: |
---|
767 | RPL_YOURESERVICE, RPL_YOURHOST, RPL_MYINFO. |
---|
768 | |
---|
769 | After dealing with this, the server MUST then send out to other |
---|
770 | servers (SERVICE message) the new service's nickname and other |
---|
771 | information as supplied by the service (SERVICE message) and as the |
---|
772 | server could discover (from DNS servers). |
---|
773 | |
---|
774 | 5.3 Establishing a server-server connection. |
---|
775 | |
---|
776 | The process of establishing a server-to-server connection is fraught |
---|
777 | with danger since there are many possible areas where problems can |
---|
778 | occur - the least of which are race conditions. |
---|
779 | |
---|
780 | After a server has received a connection following by a PASS/SERVER |
---|
781 | pair which were recognized as being valid, the server SHOULD then |
---|
782 | reply with its own PASS/SERVER information for that connection as |
---|
783 | well as all of the other state information it knows about as |
---|
784 | described below. |
---|
785 | |
---|
786 | When the initiating server receives a PASS/SERVER pair, it too then |
---|
787 | checks that the server responding is authenticated properly before |
---|
788 | accepting the connection to be that server. |
---|
789 | |
---|
790 | 5.3.1 Link options |
---|
791 | |
---|
792 | Server links are based on a common protocol (defined by this |
---|
793 | document) but a particular link MAY set specific options using the |
---|
794 | PASS message (See Section 4.1.1). |
---|
795 | |
---|
796 | 5.3.1.1 Compressed server to server links |
---|
797 | |
---|
798 | If a server wishes to establish a compressed link with its peer, it |
---|
799 | MUST set the 'Z' flag in the options parameter to the PASS message. |
---|
800 | If both servers request compression and both servers are able to |
---|
801 | initialize the two compressed streams, then the remainder of the |
---|
802 | communication is to be compressed. If any server fails to initialize |
---|
803 | the stream, it will send an uncompressed ERROR message to its peer |
---|
804 | and close the connection. |
---|
805 | |
---|
806 | The data format used for the compression is described by RFC 1950 |
---|
807 | [ZLIB], RFC 1951 [DEFLATE] and RFC 1952 [GZIP]. |
---|
808 | |
---|
809 | 5.3.1.2 Anti abuse protections |
---|
810 | |
---|
811 | Most servers implement various kinds of protections against possible |
---|
812 | abusive behaviours from non trusted parties (typically users). On |
---|
813 | some networks, such protections are indispensable, on others they are |
---|
814 | superfluous. To require that all servers implement and enable such |
---|
815 | features on a particular network, the 'P' flag is used when two |
---|
816 | servers connect. If this flag is present, it means that the server |
---|
817 | protections are enabled, and that the server REQUIRES all its server |
---|
818 | links to enable them as well. |
---|
819 | |
---|
820 | Commonly found protections are described in sections 5.7 (Tracking |
---|
821 | recently used nicknames) and 5.8 (Flood control of clients). |
---|
822 | |
---|
823 | 5.3.2 State information exchange when connecting |
---|
824 | |
---|
825 | The order of state information being exchanged between servers is |
---|
826 | essential. The REQUIRED order is as follows: |
---|
827 | |
---|
828 | * all known servers; |
---|
829 | |
---|
830 | * all known client information; |
---|
831 | |
---|
832 | * all known channel information. |
---|
833 | |
---|
834 | Information regarding servers is sent via extra SERVER messages, |
---|
835 | client information with NICK and SERVICE messages and channels with |
---|
836 | NJOIN/MODE messages. |
---|
837 | |
---|
838 | NOTE: channel topics SHOULD NOT be exchanged here because the TOPIC |
---|
839 | command overwrites any old topic information, so at best, the two |
---|
840 | sides of the connection would exchange topics. |
---|
841 | |
---|
842 | By passing the state information about servers first, any collisions |
---|
843 | with servers that already exist occur before nickname collisions |
---|
844 | caused by a second server introducing a particular nickname. Due to |
---|
845 | the IRC network only being able to exist as an acyclic graph, it may |
---|
846 | be possible that the network has already reconnected in another |
---|
847 | location. In this event, the place where the server collision occurs |
---|
848 | indicates where the net needs to split. |
---|
849 | |
---|
850 | 5.4 Terminating server-client connections |
---|
851 | |
---|
852 | When a client connection unexpectedly closes, a QUIT message is |
---|
853 | generated on behalf of the client by the server to which the client |
---|
854 | was connected. No other message is to be generated or used. |
---|
855 | |
---|
856 | 5.5 Terminating server-server connections |
---|
857 | |
---|
858 | If a server-server connection is closed, either via a SQUIT command |
---|
859 | or "natural" causes, the rest of the connected IRC network MUST have |
---|
860 | its information updated by the server which detected the closure. |
---|
861 | The terminating server then sends a list of SQUITs (one for each |
---|
862 | server behind that connection). (See Section 4.1.6 (SQUIT)). |
---|
863 | |
---|
864 | 5.6 Tracking nickname changes |
---|
865 | |
---|
866 | All IRC servers are REQUIRED to keep a history of recent nickname |
---|
867 | changes. This is important to allow the server to have a chance of |
---|
868 | keeping in touch of things when nick-change race conditions occur |
---|
869 | with commands manipulating them. Messages which MUST trace nick |
---|
870 | changes are: |
---|
871 | |
---|
872 | * KILL (the nick being disconnected) |
---|
873 | |
---|
874 | * MODE (+/- o,v on channels) |
---|
875 | |
---|
876 | * KICK (the nick being removed from channel) |
---|
877 | |
---|
878 | No other commands need to check nick changes. |
---|
879 | |
---|
880 | In the above cases, the server is required to first check for the |
---|
881 | existence of the nickname, then check its history to see who that |
---|
882 | nick now belongs to (if anyone!). This reduces the chances of race |
---|
883 | conditions but they can still occur with the server ending up |
---|
884 | affecting the wrong client. When performing a change trace for an |
---|
885 | above command it is RECOMMENDED that a time range be given and |
---|
886 | entries which are too old ignored. |
---|
887 | |
---|
888 | For a reasonable history, a server SHOULD be able to keep previous |
---|
889 | nickname for every client it knows about if they all decided to |
---|
890 | change. This size is limited by other factors (such as memory, etc). |
---|
891 | |
---|
892 | 5.7 Tracking recently used nicknames |
---|
893 | |
---|
894 | This mechanism is commonly known as "Nickname Delay", it has been |
---|
895 | proven to significantly reduce the number of nickname collisions |
---|
896 | resulting from "network splits"/reconnections as well as abuse. |
---|
897 | |
---|
898 | In addition of keeping track of nickname changes, servers SHOULD keep |
---|
899 | track of nicknames which were recently used and were released as the |
---|
900 | result of a "network split" or a KILL message. These nicknames are |
---|
901 | then unavailable to the server local clients and cannot be re-used |
---|
902 | (even though they are not currently in use) for a certain period of |
---|
903 | time. |
---|
904 | |
---|
905 | The duration for which a nickname remains unavailable SHOULD be set |
---|
906 | considering many factors among which are the size (user wise) of the |
---|
907 | IRC network, and the usual duration of "network splits". It SHOULD |
---|
908 | be uniform on all servers for a given IRC network. |
---|
909 | |
---|
910 | 5.8 Flood control of clients |
---|
911 | |
---|
912 | With a large network of interconnected IRC servers, it is quite easy |
---|
913 | for any single client attached to the network to supply a continuous |
---|
914 | stream of messages that result in not only flooding the network, but |
---|
915 | also degrading the level of service provided to others. Rather than |
---|
916 | require every 'victim' to provide their own protection, flood |
---|
917 | protection was written into the server and is applied to all clients |
---|
918 | except services. The current algorithm is as follows: |
---|
919 | |
---|
920 | * check to see if client's `message timer' is less than current time |
---|
921 | (set to be equal if it is); |
---|
922 | |
---|
923 | * read any data present from the client; |
---|
924 | |
---|
925 | * while the timer is less than ten (10) seconds ahead of the current |
---|
926 | time, parse any present messages and penalize the client by two (2) |
---|
927 | seconds for each message; |
---|
928 | |
---|
929 | * additional penalties MAY be used for specific commands which |
---|
930 | generate a lot of traffic across the network. |
---|
931 | |
---|
932 | This in essence means that the client may send one (1) message every |
---|
933 | two (2) seconds without being adversely affected. Services MAY also |
---|
934 | be subject to this mechanism. |
---|
935 | |
---|
936 | 5.9 Non-blocking lookups |
---|
937 | |
---|
938 | In a real-time environment, it is essential that a server process |
---|
939 | does as little waiting as possible so that all the clients are |
---|
940 | serviced fairly. Obviously this requires non-blocking IO on all |
---|
941 | network read/write operations. For normal server connections, this |
---|
942 | was not difficult, but there are other support operations that may |
---|
943 | cause the server to block (such as disk reads). Where possible, such |
---|
944 | activity SHOULD be performed with a short timeout. |
---|
945 | |
---|
946 | 5.9.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups |
---|
947 | |
---|
948 | Using the standard resolver libraries from Berkeley and others has |
---|
949 | meant large delays in some cases where replies have timed out. To |
---|
950 | avoid this, a separate set of DNS routines were written for the |
---|
951 | current implementation. Routines were setup for non-blocking IO |
---|
952 | operations with local cache, and then polled from within the main |
---|
953 | server IO loop. |
---|
954 | |
---|
955 | 5.9.2 Username (Ident) lookups |
---|
956 | |
---|
957 | Although there are numerous ident libraries (implementing the |
---|
958 | "Identification Protocol" [IDENT]) for use and inclusion into other |
---|
959 | programs, these caused problems since they operated in a synchronous |
---|
960 | manner and resulted in frequent delays. Again the solution was to |
---|
961 | write a set of routines which would cooperate with the rest of the |
---|
962 | server and work using non-blocking IO. |
---|
963 | |
---|
964 | 6. Current problems |
---|
965 | |
---|
966 | There are a number of recognized problems with this protocol, all of |
---|
967 | which are hoped to be solved sometime in the near future during its |
---|
968 | rewrite. Currently, work is underway to find working solutions to |
---|
969 | these problems. |
---|
970 | |
---|
971 | 6.1 Scalability |
---|
972 | |
---|
973 | It is widely recognized that this protocol does not scale |
---|
974 | sufficiently well when used in a large arena. The main problem comes |
---|
975 | from the requirement that all servers know about all other servers |
---|
976 | and clients and that information regarding them be updated as soon as |
---|
977 | it changes. It is also desirable to keep the number of servers low |
---|
978 | so that the path length between any two points is kept minimal and |
---|
979 | the spanning tree as strongly branched as possible. |
---|
980 | |
---|
981 | 6.2 Labels |
---|
982 | |
---|
983 | The current IRC protocol has 4 types of labels: the nickname, the |
---|
984 | channel name, the server name and the service name. Each of the four |
---|
985 | types has its own domain and no duplicates are allowed inside that |
---|
986 | domain. Currently, it is possible for users to pick the label for |
---|
987 | any of the first three, resulting in collisions. It is widely |
---|
988 | recognized that this needs reworking, with a plan for unique names |
---|
989 | for nicks that don't collide being desirable as well as a solution |
---|
990 | allowing a cyclic tree. |
---|
991 | |
---|
992 | 6.2.1 Nicknames |
---|
993 | |
---|
994 | The idea of the nickname on IRC is very convenient for users to use |
---|
995 | when talking to each other outside of a channel, but there is only a |
---|
996 | finite nickname space and being what they are, it's not uncommon for |
---|
997 | several people to want to use the same nick. If a nickname is chosen |
---|
998 | by two people using this protocol, either one will not succeed or |
---|
999 | both will be removed by use of KILL (See Section 3.7.1 of "IRC Client |
---|
1000 | Protocol" [IRC-CLIENT]). |
---|
1001 | |
---|
1002 | 6.2.2 Channels |
---|
1003 | |
---|
1004 | The current channel layout requires that all servers know about all |
---|
1005 | channels, their inhabitants and properties. Besides not scaling |
---|
1006 | well, the issue of privacy is also a concern. A collision of |
---|
1007 | channels is treated as an inclusive event (people from both nets on |
---|
1008 | channel with common name are considered to be members of it) rather |
---|
1009 | than an exclusive one such as used to solve nickname collisions. |
---|
1010 | |
---|
1011 | This protocol defines "Safe Channels" which are very unlikely to be |
---|
1012 | the subject of a channel collision. Other channel types are kept for |
---|
1013 | backward compatibility. |
---|
1014 | |
---|
1015 | 6.2.3 Servers |
---|
1016 | |
---|
1017 | Although the number of servers is usually small relative to the |
---|
1018 | number of users and channels, they too are currently REQUIRED to be |
---|
1019 | known globally, either each one separately or hidden behind a mask. |
---|
1020 | |
---|
1021 | 6.3 Algorithms |
---|
1022 | |
---|
1023 | In some places within the server code, it has not been possible to |
---|
1024 | avoid N^2 algorithms such as checking the channel list of a set of |
---|
1025 | clients. |
---|
1026 | |
---|
1027 | In current server versions, there are only few database consistency |
---|
1028 | checks, most of the time each server assumes that a neighbouring |
---|
1029 | server is correct. This opens the door to large problems if a |
---|
1030 | connecting server is buggy or otherwise tries to introduce |
---|
1031 | contradictions to the existing net. |
---|
1032 | |
---|
1033 | Currently, because of the lack of unique internal and global labels, |
---|
1034 | there are a multitude of race conditions that exist. These race |
---|
1035 | conditions generally arise from the problem of it taking time for |
---|
1036 | messages to traverse and effect the IRC network. Even by changing to |
---|
1037 | unique labels, there are problems with channel-related commands being |
---|
1038 | disrupted. |
---|
1039 | |
---|
1040 | 7. Security Considerations |
---|
1041 | |
---|
1042 | 7.1 Authentication |
---|
1043 | |
---|
1044 | Servers only have two means of authenticating incoming connections: |
---|
1045 | plain text password, and DNS lookups. While these methods are weak |
---|
1046 | and widely recognized as unsafe, their combination has proven to be |
---|
1047 | sufficient in the past: |
---|
1048 | |
---|
1049 | * public networks typically allow user connections with only few |
---|
1050 | restrictions, without requiring accurate authentication. |
---|
1051 | |
---|
1052 | * private networks which operate in a controlled environment often |
---|
1053 | use home-grown authentication mechanisms not available on the |
---|
1054 | internet: reliable ident servers [IDENT], or other proprietary |
---|
1055 | mechanisms. |
---|
1056 | |
---|
1057 | The same comments apply to the authentication of IRC Operators. |
---|
1058 | |
---|
1059 | It should also be noted that while there has been no real demand over |
---|
1060 | the years for stronger authentication, and no real effort to provide |
---|
1061 | better means to safely authenticate users, the current protocol |
---|
1062 | offers enough to be able to easily plug-in external authentication |
---|
1063 | methods based on the information that a client can submit to the |
---|
1064 | server upon connection: nickname, username, password. |
---|
1065 | |
---|
1066 | 7.2 Integrity |
---|
1067 | |
---|
1068 | Since the PASS and OPER messages of the IRC protocol are sent in |
---|
1069 | clear text, a stream layer encryption mechanism (like "The TLS |
---|
1070 | Protocol" [TLS]) could be used to protect these transactions. |
---|
1071 | |
---|
1072 | 8. Current support and availability |
---|
1073 | |
---|
1074 | Mailing lists for IRC related discussion: |
---|
1075 | General discussion: ircd-users@irc.org |
---|
1076 | Protocol development: ircd-dev@irc.org |
---|
1077 | |
---|
1078 | Software implementations: |
---|
1079 | ftp://ftp.irc.org/irc/server |
---|
1080 | ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/irc |
---|
1081 | ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/pub/irc |
---|
1082 | |
---|
1083 | Newsgroup: alt.irc |
---|
1084 | |
---|
1085 | 9. Acknowledgements |
---|
1086 | |
---|
1087 | Parts of this document were copied from the RFC 1459 [IRC] which |
---|
1088 | first formally documented the IRC Protocol. It has also benefited |
---|
1089 | from many rounds of review and comments. In particular, the |
---|
1090 | following people have made significant contributions to this |
---|
1091 | document: |
---|
1092 | |
---|
1093 | Matthew Green, Michael Neumayer, Volker Paulsen, Kurt Roeckx, Vesa |
---|
1094 | Ruokonen, Magnus Tjernstrom, Stefan Zehl. |
---|
1095 | |
---|
1096 | 10. References |
---|
1097 | |
---|
1098 | [KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate |
---|
1099 | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
---|
1100 | |
---|
1101 | [ABNF] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax |
---|
1102 | Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997. |
---|
1103 | |
---|
1104 | [IRC] Oikarinen, J. and D. Reed, "Internet Relay Chat |
---|
1105 | Protocol", RFC 1459, May 1993. |
---|
1106 | |
---|
1107 | [IRC-ARCH] Kalt, C., "Internet Relay Chat: Architecture", RFC 2810, |
---|
1108 | April 2000. |
---|
1109 | |
---|
1110 | [IRC-CLIENT] Kalt, C., "Internet Relay Chat: Client Protocol", RFC |
---|
1111 | 2812, April 2000. |
---|
1112 | |
---|
1113 | [IRC-CHAN] Kalt, C., "Internet Relay Chat: Channel Management", RFC |
---|
1114 | 2811, April 2000. |
---|
1115 | |
---|
1116 | [ZLIB] Deutsch, P. and J-L. Gailly, "ZLIB Compressed Data |
---|
1117 | Format Specification version 3.3", RFC 1950, May 1996. |
---|
1118 | |
---|
1119 | [DEFLATE] Deutsch, P., "DEFLATE Compressed Data Format |
---|
1120 | Specification version 1.3", RFC 1951, May 1996. |
---|
1121 | |
---|
1122 | [GZIP] Deutsch, P., "GZIP file format specification version |
---|
1123 | 4.3", RFC 1952, May 1996. |
---|
1124 | |
---|
1125 | [IDENT] St. Johns, M., "The Identification Protocol", RFC 1413, |
---|
1126 | February 1993. |
---|
1127 | |
---|
1128 | [TLS] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol", RFC 2246, |
---|
1129 | January 1999. |
---|
1130 | |
---|
1131 | 11. Author's Address |
---|
1132 | |
---|
1133 | Christophe Kalt |
---|
1134 | 99 Teaneck Rd, Apt #117 |
---|
1135 | Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660 |
---|
1136 | USA |
---|
1137 | |
---|
1138 | EMail: kalt@stealth.net |
---|
1139 | |
---|
1140 | 12. Full Copyright Statement |
---|
1141 | |
---|
1142 | Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000). All Rights Reserved. |
---|
1143 | |
---|
1144 | This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to |
---|
1145 | others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it |
---|
1146 | or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published |
---|
1147 | and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any |
---|
1148 | kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are |
---|
1149 | included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this |
---|
1150 | document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing |
---|
1151 | the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other |
---|
1152 | Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of |
---|
1153 | developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for |
---|
1154 | copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be |
---|
1155 | followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than |
---|
1156 | English. |
---|
1157 | |
---|
1158 | The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be |
---|
1159 | revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. |
---|
1160 | |
---|
1161 | This document and the information contained herein is provided on an |
---|
1162 | "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING |
---|
1163 | TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING |
---|
1164 | BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION |
---|
1165 | HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF |
---|
1166 | MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. |
---|
1167 | |
---|
1168 | Acknowledgement |
---|
1169 | |
---|
1170 | Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the |
---|
1171 | Internet Society. |
---|
1172 | |
---|