Opened 15 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#166 assigned defect
Stream wrapping streams conflict with pretty printer
| Reported by: | ehuelsmann | Owned by: | Mark Evenson |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | critical | Milestone: | 1.9.3 |
| Component: | interpreter | Version: | 1.1.0 |
| Keywords: | streams gray-streams needs-test | Cc: | Mark Evenson |
| Parent Tickets: |
Description (last modified by )
The stream wrapping streams
can't wrap Gray streams and the XP-STRUCTURE pretty printer structure.
See Also #188
Change History (35)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
| Component: | libraries → CLOS |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | xp clos added |
| Milestone: | → 0.28 |
| Owner: | changed from to |
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
| Milestone: | 0.28 → 1.1.0 |
|---|
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
| Keywords: | needs-test added |
|---|
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
| Keywords: | gray-streams added; xp clos removed |
|---|
comment:8 by , 14 years ago
| Keywords: | streams added |
|---|
comment:9 by , 14 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.1.0 → 1.1.1 |
|---|
comment:10 by , 14 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.1.1 → 1.2.0 |
|---|---|
| Priority: | major → blocker |
| Version: | → 1.1.0 |
comment:11 by , 13 years ago
| Component: | CLOS → libraries |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from to |
The problem doesn't lie in CLOS, it lies in our pretty printer or generally in our streams implementation, but not CLOS.
comment:12 by , 13 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:13 by , 13 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.2.0 → 1.3.0 |
|---|
comment:14 by , 13 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|
comment:17 by , 12 years ago
| Milestone: | 2.0.0 → 1.4.0 |
|---|
comment:20 by , 9 years ago
Now that we don't have to deal with Java 5, we can target the re-implementation of streams to Java 6.
comment:21 by , 9 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:22 by , 7 years ago
| Component: | libraries → java |
|---|
comment:23 by , 7 years ago
| Component: | java → interpreter |
|---|
comment:24 by , 7 years ago
| Priority: | blocker → critical |
|---|
comment:27 by , 6 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.6.2 → 1.7.0 |
|---|
comment:32 by , 4 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.8.1 → 1.9.0 |
|---|
comment:33 by , 4 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.9.0 → 1.9.1 |
|---|
comment:34 by , 3 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.9.1 → 1.9.2 |
|---|
comment:35 by , 3 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.9.2 → 1.9.3 |
|---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Once this ticket has been fixed, I propose we revert r13538, which works around this fact in order to be able to compile SBCL.